
Tehran, Iran — Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has offered a rare and stark glimpse into his negotiations with the administration of former US President Donald Trump, revealing that he conducted talks while expecting American bombs to fall at any moment.
Araghchi, who served as Iran's top diplomat during a period of heightened tensions between Tehran and Washington, stated that the threat of a US military strike was a constant reality for his delegation. He described a state of mind where every phone call home could have been the last.
Speaking to Iranian media, Araghchi recalled directly asking the US envoy, Steve Witkoff, a pointed question: Have you ever negotiated fearing death?
The query underscored the asymmetrical pressure both sides brought to the table.
The Iranian Foreign Minister asserted that the United States fundamentally misunderstands the Iranian psyche. No bribes, no threats,
Araghchi said. The US cannot scare people who expect death at any moment.
He argued that a nation conditioned to live under the constant shadow of war cannot be intimidated by military posturing.
During the discussions, Araghchi was pressed on who in Iran holds the ultimate authority to decide on matters of war and peace. His response was unambiguous: The Supreme Leader has the final word.
This statement left no doubt about the decision-making hierarchy in Tehran. While diplomats negotiate, the final call on any ceasefire or escalation rests with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, a dynamic that US negotiators had to navigate throughout the tense talks.
The minister’s account paints a picture of negotiations that were not merely about technical details of a nuclear deal or regional influence, but were conducted under the immediate threat of annihilation. He suggested that the US side attempted to leverage this fear, a tactic he claimed was ineffective.
Araghchi's recollection is a window into the high-stakes diplomacy that took place between two nations that had been at the brink of open conflict. The minister did not specify the exact date or venue of the conversation with Witkoff, but the context points to backchannel or direct talks aimed at de-escalation.
He framed the entire experience as a test of nerve. The Iranian team, he indicated, was fully aware that a single miscalculation by either side could trigger a devastating American response. This awareness, he argued, did not paralyze them but rather steeled their resolve.
The remarks have resonated deeply within Iran, where citizens have lived through years of sanctions, assassinations of their nuclear scientists, and the targeted killing of General Qassem Soleimani by a US drone strike in 2020. Araghchi's narrative reinforces the official state position of resilience in the face of American pressure.
What comes next is uncertain. As regional tensions simmer and Iran's nuclear program advances, the world watches to see if the current Iranian administration will pursue a similar path of high-wire diplomacy, or if the lessons of these fear-laden talks will lead to a different strategy. For now, Araghchi's account serves as a stark reminder of how close the two countries once came to the precipice of war.