
Actress Niharika NM has revealed that an 'intimacy clause' in her contract once cost her a film role. In an exclusive interview with News18, she said the co-actor refused to work with a body double for intimate scenes.
The clause, which she insisted on, became a deal-breaker. Niharika did not name the film or the actor involved.
Niharika explained that she wanted a body double for certain intimate sequences. This was to ensure her comfort and safety on set.
But the lead actor opposed the idea. He reportedly wanted to shoot the scenes directly with her. This led to a deadlock.
“The actor didn’t want a body double,” she said. The production house eventually dropped her from the project.
Intimacy clauses are becoming more common in Indian film contracts. They outline what an actor is comfortable with during intimate scenes. They also specify if a body double will be used.
Many actors, especially women, now demand such clauses. They see them as a tool to prevent exploitation and harassment on set.
Niharika’s case shows that these clauses can still lead to professional setbacks. Not all co-actors or producers are willing to accommodate them.
The actress did not elaborate on why the male lead rejected the body double. Industry insiders say some actors feel body doubles break the authenticity of a scene.
Others argue that using a double is a matter of professional respect. The debate remains unresolved in many film circles.
Niharika’s revelation adds to the ongoing conversation about consent and safety in the film industry. Several actors have spoken about their own experiences with uncomfortable scenes.
In recent years, more productions have begun hiring intimacy coordinators. These professionals help choreograph intimate scenes while ensuring all parties are comfortable.
But such practices are still not universal. Smaller productions often skip them due to budget or time constraints.
Niharika did not reveal if an intimacy coordinator was present on the set in question. She only said her demand for a body double was non-negotiable.
The actress has moved on to other projects. She did not say if she would work with the same actor or production house in the future.
Her story is likely to fuel further discussion on how Indian cinema handles intimate scenes. More actors may now feel empowered to demand similar clauses in their contracts.