Centre Assures SC of No Action on Student FIRs in NEET Protests

Centre's Assurance in Supreme Court

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that it is serious about its commitment not to pursue FIRs registered against students who participated in protests against the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). The assurance came during a hearing where the court examined the scope of withdrawing cases linked to the anti-NEET demonstrations.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, conveyed that the government would not proceed with cases against students, emphasising a lenient approach. The statement was made in response to a batch of petitions seeking quashing of FIRs filed during the protests.

States' Power to Withdraw Cases

The Supreme Court, in its observation, clarified that state governments are empowered to withdraw FIRs against demonstrators. The bench, led by the Chief Justice of India, noted that such withdrawals fall within the executive's discretion, provided they are not arbitrary or malafide.

This clarification comes as a significant relief for student activists who faced criminal charges during the intense protests against NEET, which erupted over alleged irregularities and the conduct of the exam.

Tamil Nadu's Move to Withdraw Cases

In a parallel development, the Tamil Nadu government has announced its decision to withdraw all cases registered against students during the anti-NEET protests. The state's move aligns with the broader judicial and administrative stance to de-escalate tensions and allow students to resume normal academic life.

Tamil Nadu, a hotbed of anti-NEET sentiment, had seen widespread demonstrations, leading to multiple FIRs. The withdrawal is expected to cover a significant number of cases, though officials have not yet confirmed the exact count.

Reactions and Implications

Legal experts view the Supreme Court's clarification as a balanced approach, ensuring that the right to protest is protected while maintaining legal order. The court's caveat—that withdrawals must be genuine and not aimed at shielding offenders—underscores the need for transparency.

Student bodies have welcomed the development, calling it a victory for democratic expression. However, they await the formal implementation of the withdrawal process, which now rests with the respective state governments.

What Happens Next

The Supreme Court is expected to pass a formal order in the coming weeks, which will provide a clearer framework for states to act. Meanwhile, the Centre's assurance will be documented, and states like Tamil Nadu are likely to initiate the withdrawal process promptly. Observers will watch how other states, particularly those with pending FIRs, respond to the court's guidance.