
MUMBAI โ The Dharavi Redevelopment Project (DRP) has firmly pushed back against allegations of sudden evictions, insisting that every step in the ongoing rehabilitation process adheres to legal and statutory requirements. The clarification comes amid growing unease among residents of Asia's largest slum, who fear being uprooted without adequate notice.
In a statement issued on Friday, project officials described the eviction claims as "baseless and misleading," stressing that the redevelopment authority has followed due process at every stage. They asserted that all actions, from surveying structures to issuing notices, are conducted in line with the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act and other applicable regulations.
The DRP's response appears aimed at quelling rumours that families were being forced out overnight to make way for the ambitious โน20,000-crore redevelopment plan. Officials clarified that no eligible resident will be displaced without being offered alternative accommodation under the project's comprehensive rehabilitation scheme.
"Our approach is transparent and lawful," a senior official said, requesting anonymity. "Every eligible family is entitled to a free housing unit, and we are committed to ensuring their rights are protected throughout this transition."
Despite the assurances, many Dharavi residents remain wary. Local community leaders have pointed to past instances where paperwork delays or ambiguous eligibility criteria left families in limbo. Some have demanded that the project publish a clear timeline and a list of all eligible residents to prevent any arbitrary exclusion.
"We have heard promises before," said a shopkeeper who has lived in Dharavi for over three decades. "But until we see concrete documents, we cannot fully trust the process."
The redevelopment project, which has been in the works for years, aims to transform Dharavi into a modern township with residential towers, commercial spaces, and improved infrastructure. The plan involves rehabilitating over 60,000 families living in the area, with the state government and private developers partnering on the execution.
However, the project has faced repeated delays due to legal challenges, funding issues, and the logistical complexity of relocating such a dense population. The latest controversy over evictions adds another layer of friction, even as authorities claim that physical work on the ground is progressing steadily.
Officials have also noted that a grievance redressal mechanism is in place for residents to raise concerns about their eligibility or the rehabilitation package. They urged residents to approach designated help desks rather than rely on unverified social media posts.
As the redevelopment gathers pace, the key test will be whether the project can balance its statutory obligations with the ground realities of a community that has called Dharavi home for generations. The next few months will show if the official assurances translate into tangible outcomes for residents, or if the gap between policy and practice widens further.