
Guru Randhawa's latest track 'Fine Shyt' has triggered a fresh wave of online outrage, with social media users calling it 'straight up noise pollution' and questioning the singer's creative choices. The song, which was released amid much fanfare, has become the subject of memes and criticism within hours of its debut.
The backlash is not just about the music. Many listeners have taken issue with the song's lyrics and the accompanying video, which reportedly turns a corporate office setting into a celebration of 'Gen Z confidence'. Critics, however, see it differently โ as a disrespectful portrayal of working women.
Social media platforms are flooded with reactions, with many users expressing disappointment. One viral post summed up the mood: 'Another win for the deaf.' The comment, aimed at the song's production quality, quickly gained traction.
Others have been more direct, calling the track an insult to music lovers. The criticism is not limited to the sound alone; the video's depiction of women in professional settings has drawn sharp rebukes. Several users accused Randhawa of 'sexualising corporate women', a charge that has dominated the conversation.
This is not the first time the singer has faced such backlash. Earlier, Randhawa was criticised for a song that allegedly objectified schoolgirls. That controversy had also led to a social media storm, with fans and critics alike questioning his artistic direction.
The pattern has not gone unnoticed. Observers point out that the singer's recent releases have repeatedly courted controversy, yet the commercial output continues. This time, however, the tone of the criticism feels sharper, with many calling for a change in approach.
The music video's setting โ a corporate office โ has become a focal point of the backlash. While the song's makers may have intended to project confidence and youthful energy, viewers have interpreted it as a mockery of professional environments.
Comments on social media range from sarcastic to outright angry. Some have joked that the song should be classified as a 'workplace hazard', while others have questioned whether the singer understands the realities of corporate life. The disconnect between intent and reception is stark.
Randhawa's team has not yet responded to the criticism. As of now, there has been no official statement clarifying the song's concept or addressing the allegations.
The controversy shows no signs of dying down. With the song still trending, the debate over artistic freedom versus social responsibility continues. Whether Randhawa will address the backlash or let the storm pass remains to be seen.
For now, the singer's fans are divided โ some defending his work, others joining the chorus of disapproval. The coming days will reveal if this backlash affects the song's streaming numbers or if it fades into yet another online spat.