
New Delhi: The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Friday pushed back against criticism from a US lawmaker over the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, calling it an internal matter. The response came amid growing international scrutiny of the legislation.
Addressing reporters, an MEA spokesperson said, "This is an internal matter for us." The official added that the United States itself has laws regulating the flow of foreign funds, implying that India's move is not unusual.
The criticism originated from a US legislator who expressed concerns about the Bill's potential impact on civil society and democratic freedoms in India. The lawmaker's remarks were reported widely in Indian media, prompting the MEA's rebuttal.
The spokesperson did not name the lawmaker or elaborate on specific points of criticism. Instead, the focus was on the principle of sovereign legislative autonomy.
Separately, Union Home Minister Amit Shah met with representatives of Christian bodies to address apprehensions about the Bill. He assured them that the proposed changes are “religion-neutral” and would not target any particular community.
The assurance comes after several religious and charitable organisations expressed concerns that tighter rules could hinder their fundraising activities. Shah's meeting was seen as an attempt to allay fears and build consensus around the legislation.
Interestingly, data suggests that foreign funding has actually increased in recent years despite the tightening of FCRA rules. This counters the narrative that stricter regulations are choking the flow of international money into India.
Officials have pointed to this trend as evidence that the rules are not anti-foreign funding per se, but are aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability in how such funds are utilised.
The FCRA Amendment Bill seeks to amend the existing Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010. Key provisions include stricter scrutiny of recipients, mandatory disclosure requirements, and enhanced penalties for violations.
The government maintains that these changes are necessary to prevent misuse of foreign funds for activities that could threaten national security or public order.
Opposition parties have criticised the Bill, arguing that it could be used to silence dissent and target NGOs critical of the government. However, the ruling dispensation has dismissed such charges as unfounded.
The Bill is expected to be taken up for discussion in Parliament in the coming weeks. The government will likely face tough questions from the opposition, but with a comfortable majority, its passage seems probable.
As the debate unfolds, all eyes will be on how the government balances its stated aim of regulatory clarity with the concerns of civil society. The MEA's firm stance signals that external criticism will not sway India's legislative course.