
US President Donald Trump has signed fresh executive orders aimed at restricting birthright citizenship, reigniting a contentious legal and political battle just weeks after the Supreme Court dealt his earlier attempt a setback. The orders, signed on Thursday, also target birth tourism, a practice where foreign nationals travel to the United States to give birth so their children gain American citizenship.
The new directives mark the administration's latest push to reinterpret the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, which grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil. Trump had previously attempted to end the automatic right through executive action, but the Supreme Court blocked that move, citing constitutional guarantees.
Despite that judicial rebuke, the President has pressed ahead with a revised approach. The orders are expected to face immediate legal challenges from civil rights groups and state attorneys general, who argue that the President cannot override constitutional provisions by decree.
The executive orders aim to tighten rules around citizenship documentation for children born to non-citizen parents, particularly those in the country without legal status. They also direct federal agencies to deny passports and social security numbers to children who do not meet the new, stricter criteria.
Additionally, the orders target birth tourism by instructing consular officials to deny visas to pregnant women suspected of travelling to the US solely for childbirth. The administration has long argued that the practice exploits a loophole in American immigration law.
Critics have described the move as the latest step in an obsessive campaign against birthright citizenship. Legal experts point out that the 14th Amendment's language is unambiguous, and any change would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order.
Several advocacy groups have already signalled they will file lawsuits within days, setting the stage for another judicial showdown. The Supreme Court's earlier ruling, which rejected Trump's first attempt, is likely to serve as a binding precedent in these new cases.
The orders come at a politically charged moment, with immigration set to be a central issue in upcoming elections. Supporters of the President argue that birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and undermines the rule of law. Opponents counter that the policy is a distraction from more pressing immigration reforms.
Observers note that the executive orders may be designed to energise the President's political base, even if they are unlikely to survive judicial scrutiny. Similar attempts in the past have been struck down repeatedly by federal courts.
Legal proceedings are expected to move quickly, with lower courts likely to issue injunctions against the orders within weeks. The case could eventually return to the Supreme Court, where the earlier ruling will be a central point of reference. For now, the fate of birthright citizenship remains firmly in the hands of the judiciary.